High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajni vs Amandeep Singh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 July 2022 · Citation: (2022) 07 P&H CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 9, 24 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 125
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Application No. 768 Of 2021 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 701 words

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J

Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending in the Family Court, Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Amritsar.

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of a matrimonial discord, the petitioner has filed a petition/complaint under the Domestic Violence Act at Amritsar.

Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the respondent/husband has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, as a counter-blast, before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of about 190 Kms from Amritsar to Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioner has further contended that the petitioner is having two minor children, who are living in her care and custody and she is facing difficulty to defend the case as she has to travel from Amritsar to Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments “Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay”, 2002 SC 396 and “Rajani Kishor Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi”, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardships.”

It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider the family condition of the wife, the custody of the minor child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and most important the convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.

After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in case, notice of motion is issued, even the respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh’s case (supra) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi’s case (supra) passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-

1.

The petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Amritsar.

2.

The District Judge, Amritsar, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.

3.

The Family Court, Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, Amritsar.

4.

The parties are directed to appear before the trial Court, Amritsar, within a period of 01 month from today. However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-

(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount, if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court proceedings at Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana, on each and every date of hearing.

(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the case at Camp Court Khanna, District Ludhiana in case the respondent opt to contest this petition.

Disposed of.