AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
23 paragraphs · 456 wordsHeard Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr. Diwakar Upadhyay, the learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the respondent no.1 and Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos.2 and 3.
This writ petition has been heard through Video Conferencing in view of the guidelines of the High Court taking into account the situation arising
due to COVID-19 pandemic. None of the parties have complained about any technical snag of audio-video and with their consent this matter has been
heard.
The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents to give effect to the decision taken by the Board of Directors
of the Corporation in its meeting held on 28.06.2019 pursuant to which it has been decided by the Board of Directors of the Corporation to implement
6th Pay revision for the employees of the Corporation with effect from 01.01.2006 in line with the resolution of Bihar Government vide letter dated
21.01.2010 and to pay the actual payment w.e.f. 01.04.2007 from its own sources with a rider that the payment shall be made subject to the approval
of Govt. of Bihar.
Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of Annexure-3 the dispute has been set at rest and vide
Annexure-3 the minutes of the meeting is on record which suggests that a decision has already been taken by the Board of Directors but approval is
required by the Government of Bihar. A request has already been made by the Bihar State Financial Corporation by way of Annexure-3 and 4 for
approval which is pending in the State Government and in that view of the matter the grievance of the petitioners has not been redressed as yet.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3 submits that the matter can be disposed of with a direction to the
State of Bihar to consider the matter in the light of Annexure -3 and 4 and will pass an appropriate reasoned order.
Mr. Diwakar Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the respondent State of Bihar also submits that the Government of Bihar will pass appropriate
reasoned order within stipulated period.
Accordingly, the respondent State of Bihar is directed to take a decision in accordance with the rules, regulations and guidelines and taking into
consideration the decision of the Board of Directors of the respondent Financial Corporation within a period of 12 weeks from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observation and direction the writ petition [W.P.(S) No.861 of 2020] stands disposed of.
I.A. if any also stands disposed of.
