AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 279 wordsKuldeep Mathur, J
This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.02/2022, registered at Police Station Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh, for offences under Sections 341, 323, 452 I.P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. has been registered against the petitioner for the aforesaid Sections and several cases are pending against him but in view of the fact that he has been falsely implicated in the present case, he deserves to be released on bail. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajpal S/o Seokaran arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.02/2022, registered at Police Station Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
