High CourtsSingle Bench

Raju Sahani And Ors vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 2 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 PAT CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 363, 366A, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164, 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31687 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 405 words
1.

Heard Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

(hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Maker PS Case No.07 of 2020 dated 09.01.2020, instituted under Sections 363, 366-A, 506/34

of the Indian Penal Code

3.

The allegation against the petitioners is of abduction of the minor daughter of the informant.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioner no. 1 is the elder brother; petitioners no. 2 and 3 are the parents and petitioner no. 4 is

the cousin brother, of co-accused Bipin Kumar Sahni, who has married the daughter of the informant that too with the free will of the girl. It was

submitted that due to mala fide reasons, as the family was not accepting the marriage, the present case has been lodged. It was submitted that the

same would be proved from the fact that the girl has been produced by the police before the Court and in her statement recorded under Section 164 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, she has stated that she has married the other co-accused out of her own will and wanted to go and live with

the in-laws and that the case has been falsely filed by her father. Learned counsel further submitted that the Court in its deposition has also recorded

the age of the girl as 19 years.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the allegation in the FIR is abduction of the minor daughter of the informant.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five

thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 12, Saran at Chapra in Maker PS Case No. 07 of

2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further, (i) that one of the bailors shall be a

close relative of the petitioners and (ii) that the petitioners shall co-operate with the police/prosecution and the Court. Failure to co-operate shall lead to

cancellation of their bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.