High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 10 CAL CK 0009

RAJUL JAIN AND ANR. vs REGENCY WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 3 October 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Soumen Sen
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
3243 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

37 paragraphs · 452 words
1.

On 13th September, 2017 I have directed the petitioners

to deposit the shortfall, if any, to be indicated by the association without

prejudice to their rights and contention within one week from the date of demand

and shall continue to pay the entire amount demanded by the association

towards maintenance and electricity charges till the association is formed by the

Special Officer. It appears that the dispute relates to period between 1.4.2014 till

31.3.2017. The association claims that a sum of Rs.6,31,243/- and a sum

towards electricity of Rs.2,92,941/- are the shortfalls by the petitioner no. 1 and

petitioner no. 2 respectively for the period, as aforestated. The said amount

includes maintenance charges as well. The dispute is with regard to the amount

required to be paid by the petitioners towards electricity and maintenance

charges for the area under occupation.

2.

The bills produced by the association shows that the consumption

pattern of electricity by the petitioners are on the higher side. However, the

dispute is with regard to rates to be paid for the electricity charges based on the

sub meter reading. The association said that Rs.3.50 per sq. ft. is the charge

levied by the association for the maintenance and Rs.10.95 per unit towards

electricity charges. The association says that save and except the petitioners all

the other occupants of the residence are paying the said amount. This is for the

Special Officer to see from the records as to whether all the other occupiers of the

association are paying at the said rates or not. However, considering the fact that

the petitioners would be liable for the maintenance and electricity charges for the

time being the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs. 6 lac i.e. Rs.3 lacs each,

instead of Rs.3.50 lacs, as earlier directed without prejudice to their rights and

contentions within ten days from date. The order dated 13.09.2017 is modified to

the aforesaid extent. However, the petitioners shall continue to pay the current

maintenance and electricity charges in full till the association is formed by the

Special Officer failing which the default clause in the order dated 13th September,

2017 shall revive. In the event it is found that the petitioners are overcharged the

persons presently in charge of the association, shall be personally liable to refund

the excess amount together with interest @12% per annum. The cheque for a

sum of Rs.3.50 lacs shall be returned to the petitioners within a week from date.

3.

The impugned notice stands set-aside subject to payment of the

aforesaid sum.

4.

This application accordingly stands disposed of.

5.

Since no affidavits are called for, the allegations made in the petition

are deemed to have been denied.