High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajveer Singh Kirar vs State Of M.P

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 MP CK 0095

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 21 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 37666 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 1,061 words

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J

This is the first bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C filed by the applicant for grant of bail.

Applicant has been arrested on 25/8/2020 by Police Station Ambah, District Morena(M.P.) in connection with Crime No.344/2019 registered for offence under Section 379 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant- Rajveer Singh Kirar submits that the applicant has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is in custody since 25/8/2020. The allegation of theft of 11 motorcycles against the present applicant is false. There is no criminal history against the present applicant. Investigation and trial will take its own time. The applicant is ready to abide by all the terms and conditions that may be imposed by this court while considering the application for grant of bail. There is no possibility of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case. Hence, prayed for grant of bail. He further undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions of guidance, circulars and directions issued by Central Government, State Government as well as Local Administration regarding measures in respect of COVID-19 Pandemic and maintain hygiene in the vicinity while keeping physical distancing.

Per contra, State Counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that as per prosecution case, eleven motorcycles have been recovered from the custody of the present applicant. Hence, prayed for dismissal of this firs bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length through Video Conferencing and considered the arguments advanced by them and perused the available case diary.

The Supreme Court by order dated 23-3-2020 passed in the case of IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID 19 VIRUS IN PRISONS in SUO MOTU W.P. (C) No. 1/2020 has directed all the States to constitute a High Level Committee to consider the release of prisoners in order to decongest the prisons. The Supreme Court has observed as under :

"The issue of overcrowding of prisons is a matter of serious concern particularly in the present context of the pandemic of Corona Virus (COVID - 19).

Having regard to the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it has become imperative to ensure that the spread of the Corona Virus within the prisons is controlled.

We direct that each State/Union Territory shall constitute a High Powered Committee comprising of (i) Chairman of the State Legal Services Committee, (ii) the Principal Secretary (Home/Prison) by whatever designation is known as, (ii) Director General of Prison(s), to determine which class of prisoners can be released on parole or an interim bail for such period as may be thought appropriate. For instance, the State/Union Territory could consider the release of prisoners who have been convicted or are under trial for offences for which prescribed punishment is up to 7 years or less, with or without fine and the prisoner has been convicted for a lesser number of years than the maximum.

It is made clear that we leave it open for the High Powered Committee to determine the category of prisoners who should be released as aforesaid, depending upon the nature of offence, the number of years to which he or she has been sentenced or the severity of the offence with which he/she is charged with and is facing trial or any other relevant factor, which the Committee may consider appropriate."

In view of the aforesaid and considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned for his regular appearance before the Court concerned on the dates fixed by the Court concerned.

In view of COVID-19 pandemic, the Jail Authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, his Corona Virus test shall be conducted and if it is found negative, then the concerned local Administration shall make necessary arrangements for sending the applicant to his house, and if his test is found positive then the applicant shall be immediately sent to concerning hospital for his treatment as per medical norms. If the applicant is fit for release and if he is in a position to make his personal arrangements, then he shall be released only after following guidelines issued by local administration. After release, the applicant is further directed to strictly follow all the instructions which may be issued by the Central Government/State Government or Local Administration for combating the COVID-19. If it is found that the applicant has violated any of the instructions (whether general or specific) issued by the Central Government/State Government or Local Administration, then this order shall automatically lose its effect, and the Local Administration/Police Authorities shall immediately take him in custody and would send him to the same jail from where he was released.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

1.

The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The applicant will not indulge herself/himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused. In case of repetition of offence, this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled;

5.

The applicant will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6.

The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and

7.

The applicant will inform the SHO of concerned Police Station about his/her residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of the State Counsel to send E-copy of this order to SHO of concerned Police Station for information.

Application stands allowed and disposed of.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance.

Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.