AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
29 paragraphs · 287 wordsThis appeal is preferred to question correctness of the
judgment and decree dated 6.1.2012, passed by learned
Additional District Judge, Bhadra in Civil Misc. Case No.36/2008.
Learned trial court by the judgment impugned dismissed an
application preferred under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955 by appellant Rajveer and issued a decree accordingly.
During the course of hearing of the appeal the
appellant made an offer to make payment of lumpsum amount to
respondent Champa Devi in a tune of Rs.1,00,000/- subject to
annulling marriage between the parties. Respondent Smt. Champa
Devi accepted the same with free will. This fact was recorded by
the Court on 25.5.2017. As per the agreement arrived between
the parties, the appellant has tendered a Demand Draft issued by
Punjab National Bank bearing No.925662 for a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- in favour of respondent Smt. Champa Devi. The
instrument has been given by us to Smt. Champa Devi. On asking,
Smt. Champa Devi reiterated that she is accepting the proposal
made by the appellant with her free will and without any pressure.
In view of whatever stated above, this appeal is
allowed. The judgment and decree dated 6.1.2012 are set aside.
The application preferred under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage
Act, 1955 is accepted and the marriage solemnised between the
parties on 26.6.1988 stands annulled. The respondent shall be
entitled to encash the sum tendered in the form of Demand Draft,
that shall also satisfy her claim for permanent alimony. The
respondent shall also be entitled to retain the house, reference of
which is given in para 2 of the judgment said to be under her
possession, till her lifetime. A decree be also prepared and issued
accordingly.
