High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajwant Singh vs Joint Development Commissioner And Other

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 19 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0255

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Punjab Public Premises And Land (Eviction And Recovery) Act, 1973 — Section 9
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3968 Of 2021 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 488 words

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J

This case has been taken up through Video Conferencing via Webex facility in the light of Pandemic Covid-19 situation and as per instructions.

As per pleadings on record order dated 08.01.2020 was passed by the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Gurdaspur (exercising the

powers of collector) directing ejectment of the petitioner from the landed property situated in Khasra No. 43 Min (5-4) Khasra No.44 (17-12) as epr

Jamabandi for the year 2012-13 situated in village Salempur Arian H.B.No. 345, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur.

Petitioner preferred an appeal under Section 9 of the Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Recovery) Act, 1973 against the order of

ejectment passed by the District Development and Panchayat Officer. Copy of the appeal dated 23.12.2020 has been annexed as Annexure P-3 along

with the instant petition.

Along with the appeal petitioner also filed an application for staying the operation of the ejectment order dated 08.01.2020. Copy of the application has

been appended as Annexure P-4.

Short grievance raised in the instant petition is that the Director, Rural Development and Panchayats, exercising the powers of

Commissioner/Appellate Authority, has not been holding Court and thereby causing extreme prejudice to the petitioner herein as the main appeal as

also application for stay have not even been taken up for consideration.

Counsel submits that respondent No.3 i.e. Gram Panchayat of village Salempur Arian is taking advantage of such peculiar situation and even warrants

of possession have been issued.

Against such backdrop the limited prayer made in the petition is for the appeal as also the application of stay to be taken up for hearing.

An advance copy of the writ petition has been served upon State of Punjab.

Mr.Suveer Sheokand, learned Addl.AG, Punjab, upon instructions from Sudhakar Singh, Law Officer, informs the Court that the earlier Joint

Development Commissioner Mr. Sumeet Jaglan is proceeding on training and Ms. Neelima has yet to take over charge.

It is not controverted that the next date of hearing in the appeal filed by the petitioner was otherwise fixed as 24.02.2021.

In view of the peculiar situation arising in the matter, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Appellate Authority to conduct proceedings on

24.02.2021 and to take up for consideration the statutory appeal dated 23.12.2020 (Annexure P-4) and in any case to pass orders on the stay

application that has been filed by the petitioner along with the statutory appeal.

As an interim measure operation of the ejectment order dated 08.10.2020 passed by the District Development and Panchayat Officer, Gurdaspur shall

be held in abeyance till such time the stay application preferred by the petitioner along with the statutory appeal dated 23.12.2020 is not decided.

Writ petition is disposed of.

It is, however, clarified that this Court has not examined the case on merits and the Appellate Authority would not be influenced on account of the

interim direction granted by this Court.