High CourtsSingle Bench

Rakesh Bhatt vs Dr. Arun Kumar Tripathi

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0152

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 430 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 132 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPSS No. 02 of 2017 filed by the petitioner was disposed of by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.01.2017, by permitting the

petitioner to represent his grievance before the second respondent.

2.

Alleging willful violation of the said order, this Contempt Petition has been filed.

3.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by the respondent, enclosing therewith an order dated 25.10.2017 passed by Director, Ayurvedic and Unani

Services, Uttarakhand. Perusal of the said order indicates that petitioner’s representation for promotional pay scale was considered and rejected.

4.

In such view of the matter, the contempt petition is closed.

5.

Contempt notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.

6.

However, petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the rejection order before the appropriate forum.