AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
24 paragraphs · 520 wordsHeard Mr. Sheo Jee Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Upendra Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.
The petitioners are in custody in connection with Barhara PS Case No. 212 of 2020 dated 31.05.2020, instituted under Sections 302/201/34 of the
Indian Penal Code.
The allegation against the petitioners is that they had killed the brother of the informant along with two other named persons.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the case is totally false and concocted. It was submitted that the parties are agnates having land
dispute. Learned counsel submitted that as per the allegation the deceased brother of the informant had left the house on 30.05.2020 and his body was
recovered on 31.05.2020 and after post-mortem, the FIR was lodged in the present case. However, it was submitted that more surprisingly on
31.05.2020 itself, after the present case, another case was lodged by the informant in which it is alleged that the said deceased brother was beaten up
by the same four accused, including the petitioners, on 26.05.2020. Learned counsel submitted that after lodging of the present case, to create a record
the second case has been instituted, both being false. Learned counsel submitted that in the second case also the only allegation is that the petitioners
and two others had beaten up the deceased. It was submitted that the deceased was of light mind and used to go away from his house and something
might have happened for which the petitioners are not responsible. It was submitted that besides the present case and the other case, there is no other
criminal antecedent against the petitioners and they are in custody since 17.08.2020.
Learned APP submitted that the allegation against the petitioners and two other co-accused is of killing the brother of the informant.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners be released on bail
upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in Barhara PS Case No. 212 of 2020, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close
relative of the petitioners, (ii) that the petitioners and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioners, and (iii) that the
petitioners shall also give an undertaking to the Court that they shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory
provisions, tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to
cancellation of their bail bonds. The petitioners shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to
cooperate or being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of their bail bonds.
The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.
