High CourtsSingle Bench

Rakesh Kumar vs State Of H.P

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 4 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 SHI CK 0014

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 109, 120B, 201, 304, 308, 328, 420, 468, 471 · Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 — Section 39, 40, 41
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 742 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 127 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

1.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.15/2022, dated 19.01.2022, registered under Sections 304, 308, 328, 420, 468, 471, 201, 109 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 39, 40 & 41 of the H.P. Excise Act at Police Station Sundernagar, District Mandi,

2.

Status report has been filed and the respondent has also produced the record.

3.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner states that she is under instructions to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh at an appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if need so arises. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with leave and liberty, as aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.