High CourtsDivision Bench

Rakesh Kumar vs State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 9 September 2013 · Citation: (2013) 9 ADJ 511

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satya Poot Mehrotra, J · Anjani Kumar Mishra, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 48201 of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 179 words
1.

Heard Sri Subedar Misra, holding brief for Sri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel of the petitioner, and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for quashing the Order dated 24th July, 2013 whereby the licence of the petitioner in respect of the Fair Price Shop in question has been suspended.

2.

It is not disputed that the petitioner has got an alternative remedy of filing Appeal before the Divisional Commissioner concerned against the order suspending the licence of the petitioner in respect of the Fair Price Shop in question.

3.

In view of the availability of alternative remedy of filing Appeal to the petitioner, we are not inclined to exercise our Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present case. The Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy of filing Appeal, and the same is dismissed on the said ground.