High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Ram Ayodhya Upadhaya S/o Tribhuvan Upadhaya vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 12 October 2017 · Citation: (2017) 10 PAT CK 0021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
CASE NUMBER
46450 of 2014

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 199 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2.

Petitioner is, in the present case, seeking quashing

of the order dated 26.08.2014 passed by Sri L.K. Mishra,

learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Buxar in G.R. No. 303 of

2007, arising out of Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 37 of 2007.

3.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is

that the learned Magistrate has rejected the petition dated

08.07.2014 filed under Section 300 of Cr.P.C. on wholly

erroneous ground without looking into the facts and

circumstances of the case and without considering the fact

that after duly conducted trial the petitioner was

acquitted of the same charges in G.R. No. 363/1991 arising out

of Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 88 of 1991.

4.

In course of argument, learned counsel for the

petitioner could not satisfy this court that the First Information

Report (Annexure-1) arises out of the same cause of action.

This court is of the view that the F.I.R. is in respect of

altogether a different cause of action and the learned

Magistrate has not committed any illegality in rejecting the

application of the petitioner.

5.

This application is, therefore, rejected.