High CourtsSingle Bench

Ram Janam Ojha vs J.S.E.B. and Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 13 September 2001 · Citation: (2001) 09 JH CK 0017

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 4393 of 2001
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 219 words

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.—This application has been preferred by petitioner for direction on the respondents to grant him a fresh electrical connection in the premises in question.

2.

According to petitioner, the premises in question was allotted in his favour by the Housing Board and he applied fresh electrical connection but it has not been allowed as certain dues have been shown against the erstwhile owner/occupant of the premises.

3.

Counsel for the respondents opposed the prayer on the ground that no order of allotment of the premises in favour of petitioner has been enclosed with the writ petition.

4.

In the circumstances, the case is remitted with liberty to petitioner to approach the Assistant Electrical Engineer, Adityapur, Jamshedpur. If the petitioner produces any letter of allotment of the house in question and applies for fresh electrical connection, the respondents will not force the petitioner to deposit any amount as was due against the erstwhile occupant. In such case, the authorities will be liable to give fresh electrical connection immediately on receipt of such evidence relating to allotment of the house and requisition of requisite fees and forms.

5.

If any adverse decision is taken, the authority will communicate the ground to the petitioner.

6.

The writ petition stands disposed of, with the aforesaid observations.

7.

Writ disposed of accordingly.