AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 187 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties through video conference.
The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 31.07.2018 passed in C.W J.C. No. 24663 of 2013 requiring disposal of the petitioner's representation by a speaking order for payment of his dues.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties invites reference to the order dated 13.09.2018 vide Annexure-A of the show cause filed on behalf of Opposite Party No. 3, by which the petitioner's representation has been disposed of in compliance of the order of this Court. This fact has not been controverted by the petitioner.
In the above view of the matter, this Court is satisfied that the order of the Court stands complied with.
MJC No. 4430 of 2018 stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case he is aggrieved by the order of the authority as noticed above, he may agitate the same before an appropriate forum in accordance with law, if so advised.
