AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
24 paragraphs · 541 wordsAjay Mohan Goel, J
Both these petitions have been filed by the petitioner/ plaintiff, feeling aggrieved by dismissal of the applications, filed under Order 39, Rule 1 and 2
of the Code of Civil Procedure, by learned Trial Court, as well as dismissal of the appeals filed against said orders by present petitioner, by learned
First Appellate Court.
As the parties are closely related to each other, the Court in its wisdom had requested learned counsel for the parties to make an endeavour to have
the matter amicably settled between the parties, so that the dispute between them could be solved and resolved for all times to come. It is heartening
to note that as a result of the effort, which has been so put in by learned counsel for the parties, as also the positive attitude with which the parties
went ahead for amicable settlement of their dispute, the matter once and forever has been settled between them with regard to all the disputes and
compromise, so entered into, has been reduced in writing, which has been duly signed by Shri Ram Kumar and Shri Kewal Kumar, who are present in
the Court alongwith their learned counsel and their statements to the effect that compromise (Ext.C1) has been duly entered into between them out of
their own free will and volition, have been separately recorded. The Compromise Deed is ordered to be taken on record and marked as Exhibit C-1.
Both Shri Ram Kumar and Shri Kewal Kumar through counsel, informed the Court that Smt. Shyam Lata, who happens to be their real sister and
who is respondent No.2 herein, was telephonically contacted and she was apprised of the compromise entered into between them. They informed the
Court that Smt. Shyam Lata has approved the terms of the compromise and has also through them requested that as now the matter stands amicably
settled between the parties, she may be allowed to withdraw the Counter Claims, which were filed by her in two of the Civil Suits filed by Shri Ram
Kumar.
Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of by taking on record the compromise, Ext.C1, which has been entered into between the parties, by
ordering that the Civil Suits, which have been filed by Shri Ram Kumar, stand disposed of in terms of the above compromise. Certified copy of this
order alongwith the copy of Compromise Deed as well as copies of the statements of parties which have been recorded before this Court, shall be
placed on record in all the Civil Suits, filed by Shri Ram Kumar. Similarly, the Counter Claims, which have been filed by Smt. Shyam Lata in two of
the said Civil Suits, are allowed to be withdrawn and such Court Fee as is refundedable to Smt. Shyam Lata as per Rules, be refunded. It is further
observed that the parties to the lis including Smt. Shyam Lata, shall be bound by the terms of the compromise, which has been so arrived at between
the parties and in the event of breach thereof, besides other consequences which the same may entail, same shall also be construed as Contempt of
Court. Both the petitions stand disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous applications, if any.
