AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 249 wordsSandeep Sharma, J
By way of instant petition filed under Rule 16(1) of H.P. High Court Original Side Rules, 1997, prayer has been made for implementation of
judgment dated 24.3.2021 passed by this court in CWPOA no. 4979 of 2020, titled Ram Pal Sharma V. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, whereby
this court, disposed of the petition by making directions contained in judgment dated 22nd October, 2010 passed in CWP(T) No. 5495 of 2008 titled as
Prakash Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, mutatis mutandis applicable to the case of the petitioner also. Since the respondents have
failed to implement the judgment dated 24.3.2021, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings, seeking implementation of the
judgment in question.
Mr. Sudhir Bhatnagar, learned Additional Advocate General, while accepting notices on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has
reasons to believe that the judgment in question stands implemented, but if not, same would be implemented, within a period of four weeks.
Consequently, in view of the fair stand taken by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive
and same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment (supra), within four weeks, failing which petitioner
would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so that appropriate steps towards execution of the order in question are taken. Petition stands
disposed of in above terms..
