High CourtsSingle Bench

Ram Pandey @ Ram Kumar vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 2 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 PAT CK 0006

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 149, 283, 353, 504 · Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1968 — Section 5, 6 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31866 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 384 words
1.

Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Mahua PS Case No. 127 of 2018 dated 29.05.2018, instituted under Sections

147/149/353/504/283 of the Indian Penal Code and 5/6 of the Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1968.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner, along with 17 other named persons and 75 unknown persons, is of forming illegal assembly, abusing

government employees and deterring public servants from discharging their duties. It was submitted that as per the FIR, people had gathered

demanding compensation for the death of a buffalo of Sanjay Kumar who was also injured due to electric current and had also indulged in unlawful

activity. It was submitted that no specific overt act has been alleged against the petitioner and further that he did not carry any criminal antecedent

and only after more than a year of the present case, another case under the Excise Act has been instituted in which he is accused.

4.

Learned APP submitted that the petitioner was part of the unlawful mob. However, she did not controvert that there is no specific allegation of any

overt act against the petitioner.

5.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Mahua PS Case

No. 127 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further, (i) that one of the bailors

shall be a close relative of the petitioner, and (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner

and the petitioner shall cooperate with the police/prosecution and the Court. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or failure to

cooperate shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

6.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.