High CourtsSingle Bench(1997) 05 AHC CK 0153

Ram Shabad Yadav and Others vs Collector and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 16 May 1997 · Citation: (1997) AWC 196 Supp : (1997) RD 635

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Katju, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.M.W.P. No. 14189 of 1993

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 374 words

M. Katju, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned standing counsel.

2.

The Petitioners have filed this writ petition claiming a writ of mandamus for cancelling the declaration of the Lekhpal examination and directing the Respondents to permit (he Petitioners to undergo Lekhpal training.

3.

A counter-affidavit has been filed and in paragraph 4 of the same, it has been stated that the Petitioners never passed in the written examination and hence there was no question of calling them for interview. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that this averment in the counter-affidavit is false. I am not in agreement with this submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. There is no reason to disbelieve the averments in the counter-affidavit that the Petitioners never passed the written test.

4.

In this case, by an interim order dated 28.4.1993 the Petitioners were provisionally admitted in the Lekhpal Training School. Gorakhpur. In my opinion, this interim order confers no right on the Petitioners.

5.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner then submitted that in pursuance of the interim order dated 28.4.1993 the Petitioners completed their training and some of the Petitioners have passed the training examination and have joined as Lekhpal, while some others have failed in the training examination. He submitted that every candidate who failed in the training examination has a right to appear again in the next examination.

6.

In my opinion, this argument is not available to the Petitioners. It is only the person who has been validly selected in the entrance test of Lekhpal who can claim that he has three chances of appearing in the training examination after the training is over. A person who has in fact failed in the written test for seeking admission cannot raise this plea at all as he was never validly selected. Hence this argument of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner has no force.

7.

Thus, this petition fails and is dismissed. The service of the Petitioners who have joined as Lekhpals will be terminated forthwith since they never passed in the admission test and hence have no right to the post. The Registrar of this Court shall forthwith send a copy of this judgment to the Collector. Azamgarh for necessary action.