High CourtsSingle Bench

RAM SHANKAR & ANR vs BINOD KUMAR RAI & ORS

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 DEL CK 0133

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.R. MIDHA
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MAC.APP. 1024 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 476 words

1.The appellants have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs. 7,11,934/- has awarded to the appellants. The

appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation.

2.The accident dated 30th April, 2014 resulted in death of Sudeep Kumar. The deceased was 23 ½ years at the time of accident and was working

as truck conductor. It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.15,000/- per month, However, in absence of any proof of income, the Claim

Tribunal took minimum wages of Rs. 6,999/- in respect of a semiskilled worker in UP. The Claim Tribunal deducted 50% of income towards

personal expenses of the deceased and applied multiplier to 11 as per the age of the mother of deceased to compute loss of financial dependency as

Rs.4,61,934/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded of Rs.1,50,000/- towards loss of love & affection, Rs.50,000/- towards funeral expenses and

Rs.50,000/- towards loss of estate. Total compensation awarded is Rs.7,11,934/-.

3.Learned counsel for the appellants urged that at the time of hearing that income of the deceased be taken according to minimum wages of Rs.

8,528/- as the deceased was working in Delhi. It is further submitted that the 40% future prospects be added and multiplier be enhanced from 11 to

18 according to National Insurance Co. Limited v. Pranay Sethi 2017 SCC Online SC 1270

4.Learned counsel for the respondent submits that non-pecuniary compensation be reduced to Rs.30,000/- in terms of National Insurance Co.

Limited vs. Pranay Sethi (Supra).

5.There is merit in the contentions urged by learned counsel for the appellants. The deceased was working in Delhi and minimum wages of for Delhi

i.e. Rs.8,528/- of semi-skilled person are taken as income of the deceased. The appellant entitled to addition of 40% future prospects and multiplier

of 18 according to National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi (supra). The compensation towards loss of love and affection of Rs.1,50,000/- is

set aside. The compensation for loss of estate and funeral expenses is reduced to Rs.15,000/- each.

6.Taking the income of the deceased of Rs.8,528/-, adding at 40% towards future prospects, deducting ½ towards personal expenses and applying

the multiplier of 18, the loss of dependency is computed as Rs.12,89,433.6 (rounded off to Rs. 12,89,434/-). Adding Rs.15,000/- towards funeral

expenses and Rs. Rs.15,000/- towards loss of estate, the total compensation is computed as Rs.13,19,434/-.

7.The appeal is allowed and the award amount is enhanced from

Rs.7,11,924/- to Rs.13,19,434/- along with interest @ 9% per annum per annum from the date of the institution i.e. 19th August, 2014 till realization.

8.

The appellant is directed to deposit the enhanced award amount with the Registrar General of this Court within four weeks.

9.List for disbursement of the enhanced compensation amount on 12th July, 2018.

10.Copy of this judgment be given dasti to learned counsels for the parties under signature of Court Master.