High Courts

Ram Singh and others vs State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 1 April 2009 · Citation: (2009) 04 AHC CK 0634

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 270 words

Alok K. Singh, J.

Heard.

Admit.

Call for the lower court record.

List for hearing on its turn after the record is received.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. on the prayer for bail.

The appellants have been convicted and sentenced in Sessions Trial No.479 of 2000 as under

1.Under Section 147 I.P.C. Six months'' R.I.

2.Under Section 323/149 I.P.C.Six months'' R.I.

3.Under Section 307/149 I.P.C. Three years'' R.I. with a fine of Rs.1000/ each.

It is submitted that the severity of punishment is not much. It is further submitted that the nature of accusation is also not very serious. During trial they were on bail which they never misused. Presently they are on interim bail. It is also submitted that speedy justice is a fundamental right but the appeal may take a couple of years or even more in its final disposal. The appellants have every hope of success in the appeal.

The bail is, however, opposed by learned A.G.A.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and without entering into merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the appellants (Ram Singh, Smt. Badki @ Siya Lalli, Beche Lal and Vikram) be enlarged on bail on their furnishing personal bonds and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned.

However, the fine is not stayed. Let the same be deposited within one month from the date of their release, if not already deposited. Subject to the above the sentence of imprisonment shall remain suspended during the pendency of the appeal.