High CourtsSingle Bench

Ram Singh vs Pramod Kumar Singh & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 16 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0234

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 285 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 217 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPSS No. 618 of 2017, filed by the petitioner, was disposed of in terms of judgment rendered by this Court in WPSS No. 1312 of 2016. The

operative portion of the judgment dated 13.12.2016 rendered in WPSS No. 1312 of 2016 is extracted below:-

“11. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition hence succeeds. A mandamus is hereby issued to the Uttarakhand Cooperative Federation to give

all the post retiral dues to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.â€​

2.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Chairman, Uttarkahand Cooperative Federation Ltd. UCF Sadan, Deep Nagar

Road, Dehradun.

3.

Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that entire terminal benefits, amounting to ₹8,10,783/-, was released in

favour of the petitioner on 19.05.2017 i.e. prior to filing of the contempt petition. In support of his contention, he has drawn attention of this Court to

para 4 and 5 of the compliance affidavit filed by opposite party no. 1.

4.

Since entire terminal benefits have been paid to the petitioner, therefore, nothing survives in this contempt petition.

5.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.