High CourtsSingle Bench

Ramakrishnan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 14 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 KL CK 0140

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Badharudeen, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Kerala Abkari Act., 1967 — Section 8(1), 8(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 516 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 566 words

A.Badharudeen, J

1.

The petitioner is the accused in C.R No.5/2023 of Pattambi Excise Range Office, Palakkad. The petitioner has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking regular bail, where he alleged to have committed offences punishable under Section 8(1) & (2) of the Kerala Abkari Act.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

3.

The prosecution case is that at 7.20 p.m on 11.01.2023, the accused herein possessed 3.5 litre of arrack mixed with IMFL for the purpose of sale. He was nabbed along with contraband and crime alleging offences punishable under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Kerala Abkari Act, was registered.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he is liable to be released on bail. He also pointed out the progress of the investigation and the custody of the petitioner from 11.01.2023 onwards, while pressing for bail.

5.

Whereas the learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the regular bail on the submission that though the quantity of the contraband in the present crime is only 3.5 litre of arrack, the petitioner had involvement in two more crimes during the year 2019 and 2021 and in the said cases, contraband recovered were 1 litre of arrack and 708 litre of Wash as well as 5 litre of arrack and 1100 litre of Wash. Hence, the petitioner is a habitual offender. Therefore his immediate release on bail, not only would hamper the investigation but also would facilitate him to involve in crimes of similar nature.

6.

On perusal of the case diary, it is true that the petitioner was nabbed on 11.01.2023 when he was found in possession of 3.5 litre of arrack mixed with IMFL. But as per CR.No.47/2019 of Pattambi Range alleging commission of offence punishable under Sections 8(1) & (2) and 55(g) of the Kerala Abkari Act, he alleged to have possessed 1 litre of arrack and 708 litre of Wash. Similarly, in another crime of the same station vide CR.No.81/2021, he was found in possession of 5 litre of arrack and 1100 litre of Wash. Thus the prosecution allegation that the petitioner is a habitual offender and has been continuously involving in Abkari offences is having force. The involvement of the petitioner in repeated crimes is noted with extreme displeasure. However, having noted his custody from 11.01.2023 onwards and the progress of the investigation, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail on the following conditions:

i. Accused/petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court concerned.

ii. Accused/petitioner shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence. He shall co-operate with the investigation and shall be available for trial. He shall visit the Investigating Officer on every Monday in between 9 a.m and 12 noon for a period of two months and also appear before the Investigating Officer as and when directed.

iii. Accused/petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the jurisdictional court.

iv. Accused/petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during the currency of bail and any such event, if reported or came to the notice of this Court, the same shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted.