High CourtsDivision Bench

Ramamirtha Ayyan vs Gopala Ayyan

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 July 1896 · Citation: (1896) ILR (Mad) 433

HON’BLE JUDGES
Davies, J · Boddam, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 123
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 187 words
1.

We have no doubt that a deed of gift is not complete until it has been registered as required by Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, and

that it only operates upon registration. In this ease the deed of gift was not registered until the sale had been completed and, therefore, was not

effectual as against the deed of sale.

2.

We are further of opinion that a deed of gift being a voluntary transfer remains nudum pactum until the donor has done all that is necessary to

make it legally complete. To do so, it is necessary, inter alia, that it should be registered; but he can be no more compelled to register the deed than

to execute it in the first instance. The registration of the present deed contrary to the supposed donor''s wishes, which was ordered by the

Registrar, was therefore void. We accordingly hold there was no gift, and reverse the decision of the Subordinate Judge and restore that of the

Munsif. The appellant''s costs in this Court and in the first Appellate Court must be paid by the respondent.