High CourtsSingle Bench

Raman Kumar and others vs State of Punjab and others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 December 2011 · Citation: (2011) 12 P&H CK 0098

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajan Gupta, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition N0. 24208 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 222 words

Rajan Gupta J.—Petitioners have sought a direction from this court to provide employment to them as per policy (Annexure P-1) and also give benefit of judgment rendered by this court in CWP N0. 787 of 2008 titled as Dharam Singh & ors. vs. State of Punjab & ors., decided on 26.11.2009 (Annexure P-6). Learned counsel submits that in view of the policy and judgment aforesaid, the petitioners are entitled to be considered for appointment.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

On the asking of the court, Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, DAG, Punjab accepts notice.

4.

Learned State counsel submits that in view of order passed by this court, claim of the petitioners can be considered by respondents N0. 2 to 4. However, liberty may be granted to the State to see if claim of the petitioners is distinguishable from those in CWP N0. 787 of 2008 and pass an order accordingly.

5.

In view of above, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents N0. 2 to 4 to consider claim of the petitioners in view of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme dated 18.11.1993 and judgment delivered by this court. The respondents shall, however, be at liberty to pass appropriate orders in case it is found that claim of the petitioners is distinguishable from the petitioners in CWP N0. 787 of 2008.