High Courts(1893) 10 MAD CK 0012

Ramappa Udayan vs Armugath Udayan

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 October 1893 · Citation: (1894) ILR (Mad) 182 : (1894) 4 MLJ 30

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 80 words
1.

We think the case quoted by the Subordinate Judge at I. L. R. 14 M 149 Nallanna v. Ponnal, is sufficient authority for holding that a daughter''s

daughter is a bandhu on the principle laid down that consanguinity may be recognized as the basis of title to succession in the absence of

preferential male heirs, Minakshi was a direct relation by blood to her grandfather through her mother his daughter.

2.

The second appeal therefore fails and is dismissed.