High CourtsDivision Bench

Ramaswami Konar vs Nachiar Ammal

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 October 1939 · Citation: (1940) 52 LW 350 : (1940) 2 MLJ 491

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmana Rao, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 93 words

Lakshmana Rao, J.—The complaint of defamation is founded on allegations in a petition and sworn statement to the Sub-Divisional

Magistrate and the allegations are stated to be false. The offence committed would therefore fall u/s 182 or Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code

and as held Appadurai Nainar Vs. Sampath Rao Nainar and Another, , parties cannot be allowed to eyade the provisions of Section 195 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure by filing a complaint under another provision of law. The revision petition is therefore allowed and the proceedings are

quashed.