AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
66 paragraphs · 1,574 wordsJyotsna Rewal Dua, J
CMP No.13882/2020 has been jointly moved by the parties under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure placing on
record the compromise arrived between them in settlement of the entire lis and for the disposal of the instant civil revision in terms of the consensus so
arrived between the parties. The contents of the application are extracted hereinafter:Â
“1. That the above noted petition arising out of an order of eviction passed by Learned Appellate Authority on 06.01.2011 whereby
order dated 31.10.2008 passed by learned Rent Controller was reversed. The petitionerÂapplication is continuing in possession of the
demised premises in question. The petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Court.
That during the pendency of the petition, an application being CMP No.9639 of 2019 was also filed by respondent applicant, claiming
use and occupation charges against petitionerÂapplicant from the date of order of eviction granted by the learned Appellate Authority on
06.01.2011. The said application is also pending adjudication.
That the parties to the petition had recently decided to put an end to the litigation by way of an amicable settlement. In furtherance of
same, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties which they are desirous of getting recorded by way of present application and
are also desirous of getting the present proceedings disposed of on the basis of compromise arrived at between them. The terms of the
settlement are as under:Â
(a) That petitionerÂapplicant has agreed to suffer an order of eviction without any reservation of any further or other right, including
“right of re entry save and except that he undertakes to surrender vacant and peaceful possession of the premises by or before 31st
December, 2020. RespondentÂapplicant has agreed to the same and has also agreed that in lieu of petitionerÂapplicant suffering order of
eviction, respondentÂapplicant shall pay to petitionerÂapplicant a total sum of Rs.3,00,000/Â(Rupees three Lakhs) only which amount shall
be paid by respondentÂapplicant to petitionerÂapplicant on the day, an order is passed by the Hon’ble Court in the present application,
recording the present settlement arrived at between the parties.
(b) That the petitionerÂapplicant has agreed and undertaken not to create any 3rd party right(s) in respect of the premises in his
occupation. PetitionerÂapplicant shall in no way defeat the claim of respondentÂapplicant by creating any kind of nuisance, damage or
putting any third party in possession of the premises in question or parting with the possession or receiving any money or entering into any
agreement in respect of the premises in question. PetitionerÂapplicant has further agreed and undertaken to clear the entire outstanding
arrears of water and electricity charges upto the date of handing over of possession of the premises in his occupation.
(c) The petitionerÂapplicant represents that she alone is in possession of the premises in question and upon she having agreed to suffer an
order of eviction, there is no other person(s) from her family who has an independent claim in the premises in question. PetitionerÂapplicant
further agrees and undertakes that she has on her own volition given up her right to claim reÂentry, as is envisaged under the amended
provisions of H.P. Urban Rent Control Act after surrendering of possession and further has no objection in case, respondentÂapplicant
either himself reÂconstruct the building or sells it or further enters into any other transaction with any other person in order to beneficially
utilize the property owned by her. Thus, it is agreed between the parties that respondentÂapplicant would not be under any legal obligation
to put petitionerÂapplicant or any of her family member(s) in possession of the premises in question after the building in question is
demolished and reconstructed/rebuilt or disposed of by respondentÂapplicant.
(d) That respondentÂapplicant has agreed and undertaken not to press/claim use and occupation charges from petitionerÂapplicant
consequently, C.M.P No.9639 of 2019 shall be deemed to be dismissed as withdrawn upon acceptance of the present application by the
Hon’ble Court.
(e) That petitionerÂapplicant has further agreed and undertaken to furnish a no objection certificate, affidavit or any other document that
may be required by respondentÂapplicant for having the water and electricity connection(s) transferred in the name of respondent or in the
name of any other person, to whom a right may be conferred by respondentÂapplicant.
(f) That there is no other claim/counter claim amongst the parties, save and except the aforesaid mutual obligations which are to be
performed by the parties. The parties agree that they shall abide by the aforesaid terms in letter and spirit and any nonÂperformance
thereof shall lead to consequence of breach of undertaken given to the Hon’ble Court, which shall confer a right upon either of the
parties not only to enforce the terms of settlement but to initiate proceedings for contempt against the defaulting party.
That since the entire dispute involved in the petition has been settled by way of compromise, terms whereof have been reproduced
hereinabove, it would thus be expedient to accept the compromise and dispose of petition on the terms mentioned above.
It is, thereafter prayed that in the interest of justice application may be allowed and the compromise arrived at between the parties on the
terms mentioned at sub paras (a) to (e) under paraÂ3 of the application may be accepted and the petition may be disposed of accordingly.
Any other order that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in the interest of
justice.â€
Sd/- Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
                                               Sd/-
PetitionerÂApplicant                Â
                                              RespondentÂApplicant
Through                                             Â
                                   Through
Counsel                                              Â
                                   Counsel
Sd/-Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
                                   Sd/-
S himla           (Peeyush Verma)        Â
                                                          (Ajeet Jaswal)
11.12.2020      Advocate                    Â
                                                          Advocateâ€
The application is duly supported with the affidavits of the parties. The settlement/compromise as arrived between the parties is accepted and the civil
revision is disposed of in terms thereof. Parties are directed to abide by all the terms and conditions of the compromise. All pending applications,if any,
are also disposed of including CMP No.9639/2019, which as per para 3(d) of the compromise is dismissed as withdrawn.
