High CourtsSingle Bench

Rambilas vs State Of M.P

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 17 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 304
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.2434 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 453 words

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime

No.899/2021, registered at Police Station Kishanganj, Dr.Ambedkar Nagar, District Indore (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under

Section(s) 304 of IPC.

Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 10.12.2021 a quarrel took place between the applicant and his brother Pooran. It is alleged against the applicant

that he in a drunken state drove his vehicle truck bearing registration No.GJ-06-AV-6315 negligently, due to which deceased came under left frontal

tyre and died.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that at the time of incident his brother deceased Pooran was in a drunken state and was coming alongwith

deadly weapon Tommy to assault the applicant and applicant in his right to private defence tried to move from the spot with the truck, during which

deceased came under his left frontal tyre. Applicant did not commit any act intentionally. He was not aware about the fact that his brother was near

his truck. He is in custody since 22.12.2021. Trial will take time for its conclusion. Hence, prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.

Learned counsel for respondent/State opposes the application and submits that applicant intentionally in a drunken sate drove the vehicle negligently

and caused death of the deceased. Therefore, he is not entitled for bail.

Having considered the rival submissions, material produced on record and the fact that applicant and deceased both were real brothers, on the date of

incident a quarrel took place between them on a very trivial issue, thereafter deceased came under the left frontal tyre of the applicant's vehicle and

also considering other facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. Hence, without

commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

It is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand Only) with a

solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before the trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed

in this behalf by the trial Court during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of

Cr. P. C.

In view of the outbreak of 'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19)' the concerned Jail Authority is directed to follow the directions/ guidelines issued by

the Government with regard to COVID-19 before releasing the applicant.

This M.Cr.C. stands allowed and disposed of.

C. C. as per rules.