High CourtsSingle Bench

Ramdhari vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 P&H CK 0093

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi I. Mehta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5319 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 332 words

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J

By way of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a writ in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing

the action on the part of the respondents in ignoring his claim for promotion to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer (Civil) while promoting

respondents No.5 and 6, who were junior to him in service, to the said post. He has also made a further prayer to issue a writ in the nature of

MANDAMUS directing the respondents to promote him to the said post from the date when his said juniors were so promoted and to pay all the

consequential benefits to him along with interest thereon @ 12% per annum and has averred that he has wrongly been denied the afore-claimed

benefits and though, he moved a representation dated 19.12.2020 (Annexure P-12) to respondent No.2 for seeking redressal of his afore-mentioned

grievance but the same has not yet been decided.

Mr. S.S. Pannu, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, has joined the proceedings on behalf of respondent No.1 in pursuance of the copy of

this petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance.

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is given to respondent No.2 to consider and decide

his said representation (Annexure P-12) within some specific time frame.

Learned State counsel has no objection for the same.

Keeping in view the above-discussed limited prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner and without commenting upon the merits of the matter in

hand, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Managing Director, Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited,

to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-12) in accordance with law/relevant rules/regulations, by passing a

speaking order thereon, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

This petition stands disposed of accordingly.