AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 277 wordsDhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, J.—Before the learned counsel for the petitioners argues in detail that there is noncompliance of the order
passed by this Court, it is fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the State that today they have brought eight cheques each worth Rs.
5,00,000/- in the Court and these four petitioners are getting per head Rs. 10,00,000/-.
The details of the cheques are as under:
In view of the aforesaid submission, these cheques are handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners, who in turn give acknowledgment
to the learned counsel for the State.
It is fairly submitted by learned counsel for the State that the aforesaid amount will be set off against the final calculation of the amount found
legally payable to the petitioners and if further amount is yet to be paid, it is submitted by learned counsel for the State that the petitioners may
prefer a representation before opposite party No. 3 and upon receipt of such representation, the same will be decided in accordance with law
within further period of eight weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is satisfied with the aforesaid payment and it is submitted that if the petitioners are seeking any further
amount, then the same will be mentioned in their representation to be preferred before opposite party No. 3.
If such representation is received by opposite party No. 3, the same will be decided, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks
from the date of receipt of such representation. In view of the aforesaid payment and in view of the aforesaid direction, this contempt application is,
hereby, disposed of.
