High CourtsSingle Bench

Ramesh @ Sattal vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 29 February 2012 · Citation: (2012) 02 UK CK 0022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 364
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 96 of 2012

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 185 words

Hon''ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Heard.

2.

Applicant- Ramesh @ Sattal, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 248 of 2011, relating to offence punishable u/s 364 of I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Gangnahar Rookee, District Hardwar, has sought his release on bail.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the First Information Report is delayed one. It is further submitted that applicant is not named in the First Information Report. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that co-accused Aakash @ Gola has already been directed to be released on bail by this court on 21.02.2012. It is pleaded that applicant has no criminal history.

4.

In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail.

5.

The Bail Application is allowed. Let the applicant-Ramesh @ Sattal, be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee. (Urgency Application No. 1051 of 2012 stands disposed of).