High CourtsDivision Bench

Rameshwar Singh vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 1 July 2022 · Citation: (2022) 07 PAT CK 0011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashutosh Kumar, J · Jitendra Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5400 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 199 words
1.

Heard Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, the learned counsel for the State.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is that his license has been cancelled but before that, only three days’ time was given to him to represent his cause. Though he could anyhow file his show-cause reply, but the same has also not been adverted to.

3.

A perusal of the order impugned indicates that the grounds raised on behalf of the petitioner has actually been adverted to, but has not been accepted.

4.

In any view of the matter, the petitioner has the remedy of preferring an appeal against the aforesaid order.

5.

In that event, this Court directs the petitioner to prefer an appeal, if so desired, before the appellate authority within a period of 60 days.

6.

Should such an appeal be filed, the appellate authority, after giving reasonably sufficient time to the petitioner to represent his cause, shall pass a reasoned order within a further period of 60 days thereafter. The copy of such order shall be made available to the petitioner forthwith.

7.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.