High CourtsSingle Bench

Ranjan Kumar Behera vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 14 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 OHC CK 0106

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. P. Routray, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376(2)(n), 506 · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 6
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 171 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 309 words

B. P. Routray, J

I.A. NO.353 OF 2020

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

This application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is for bail upon appeal of the appellant Ranjan Kumar Behera who has been convicted for the offence

under Sections 376(2)(n)/506 of I.P.C. and Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1 lakh,

I.D. to further undergo R.I. for one year for the offence under Section 6 of POCSO Act and to undergo R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of

Rs.10,000/-, I.D. to undergo further R.I. for three months for the offence under Section 506 of I.P.C. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-

Special Judge, Boudh in his judgment dated 6th February, 2020 passed in Special Case No.25 of 2013 (POCSO Act).

3.

It is submitted that the appellant was on bail in course of trial and has not misused the liberty granted to him.

4.

After hearing learned State counsel and considering the statement of the victim made in her deposition as P.W.1, it is directed to release the

appellant on bail pending appeal in Special Case No.25 of 2013 (POCSO Act), arising out of G.R. Case No.87 of 2013 corresponding to Harabhanga

P.S. Case No.20 of 2013 on such terms and conditions to be fixed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special, Judge, Boudh.

5.

The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.

6.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798, dated 15th April, 2021.

…………….…………..