High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 08 JH CK 0292

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar Chandravanshi @ Ranjeet Chandravanshi vs State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 28 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajesh Shankar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 3884 of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 256 words

The petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341/323/307/504/34 IPC. However, subsequently the charge sheet has been submitted under Sections 341/504/302/34 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's prayer for bail was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 14.06.2019 passed in B.A. No. 4588/2019. By way of present bail application, the petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail. The main submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though the petitioner is in judicial custody since 01.01.2019, however, the trial of the case has not yet been concluded. It is also submitted that the informant is not an eyewitness to the alleged occurrence and the petitioner has been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of previous enmity and suspicion. Hence, the petitioner may be given the privilege of regular bail.

Learned A.P.P while opposing the petitioner's prayer for bail, submits that earlier the petitioner's prayer for bail was rejected by this Court on merit. The petitioner has not made out any fresh ground for reconsideration of his prayer for bail. It is further submitted that the informant, doctor and I.O of the case are yet to be examined in the trial. Hence, the petitioner may not be given the privilege of regular bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to reconsider the petitioner's prayer for bail in connection with S.T. No. 248/2019.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the above named petitioner is rejected.