AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 324 wordsHeard the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Namkum P.S. Case No. 266 of 2019 corresponding to S.T. No. 45 of 2020 registered under
Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he was involved in commission of murder of the deceased-
Vishnu Kumar Srivastav. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither directly
involved in the alleged offence nor named in the F.I.R. and there is no eye-witness to the occurrence and neither there is any direct evidence against
the petitioner to show involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only
on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been
released on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2020 passed in B.A. No.3325 of 2020. It is further submitted that the
petitioner was not put on T.I.P. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted
that the petitioner has been in custody 18.09.2019 as is evident from para-08 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be
released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty
five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.J.C.-XVII, Ranchi in connection with Namkum P.S. Case
No. 266 of 2019 corresponding to S.T. No. 45 of 2020 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case.
