High CourtsSingle Bench

Ranjit Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 8 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 PAT CK 0107

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 149, 186, 226, 307, 323, 337, 338, 341, 353, 427, 504, 506
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37612 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 465 words
1.

Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

(hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kawakole PS Case No.157 of 2019 dated 04.06.2019, instituted under Sections 147/ 149/ 341/ 323/

307/ 353/ 337/ 338/ 427/ 186/ 226/ 504/ 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The petitioner along with few named and 30-40 unknown is accused of pelting stones on the police and causing injuries.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the FIR itself no specific allegation of any overt act is alleged against the petitioner and

same is general and omnibus with regard to many persons. It was submitted that even the allegation is that the petitioner was part of the mob, which

was pelting brickbats on the police and others resulting in some injuries. It was submitted that all injuries are simple in nature and the petitioner having

no criminal antecedent is in custody since 01.06.2020. It was further submitted that the police is said to have come to the village on information that

there was some fight between Mithilesh Kumar and others and thereafter the incident occurred. Learned counsel submitted that co-accused, Niru

Yadav, Lalan Yadav and Lalu Yadav have been granted bail on 19.09.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 59443 of 2019.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the petitioner is accused of throwing brickbats on the police party. However, it was not controverted that the

allegations are general and omnibus against many persons.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail

upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM 1st,

Nawada, in Kawakole PS Case No.157 of 2019, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that

the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall also give an

undertaking to the Court that he shall not indulge in any illegal/criminal activity, act in violation of any law/statutory provisions, tamper with the

evidence or influence the witnesses. Any violation of the terms and conditions of the bonds or the undertaking shall lead to cancellation of his bail

bonds. The petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or being absent on two

consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall also lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.