Ranveer Singh Yadav vs Union Of India And Others

M.A No. 949 of 2020:

The records reveal that there is a delay of 7086 days in filing the instant O.A. In view of the averments made in the miscellaneous application and

finding the same to be bona fide, we condone the delay. The instant M.A stands disposed of accordingly.

0.A No. 832 of 2020:

The applicant seeks for a direction to the respondents to fix his pension in the rank of CHELP in the light of the decisions of this Tribunal in Ex Sub

Cop! Singh Rajput v. Union of India and others (0.A No. 516 of 2020 dated 16.03.2020), Ex Sub Mohar Singh v. Union of India and others (0.A No.

444 of 2015 dated 27.09.2017) and Ex PO Harvinder Singh Yadav v. Union of India and others (0.A No. 506 of 2018 dated 23.05.2019) and to pay

arrears along with interest @ 18% per annum till payment.

The applicant was enrolled in the Indian Navy on 06.01.1983. He was promoted to the rank of CHELP on 01.01.1998, after having served in the

said rank for a period of one month. However, he was sanctioned pension only in the rank of Petty Officer, on account of which he has been

receiving pension in the rank of Petty Officer since the date of his discharge.

Learned counsel for the applicant has brought to our notice the circular dated 09.02.2001, whereby the Ministry of Defence implemented the

recommendations of the 5th Central Pay Commission relating to pensionary benefits in respect of commissioned officers and personnel below officers'

rank. It has been clarified in the said notification that all Armed Forces pensioners, irrespective of their date of retirement, shall not get less than 50%

of the minimum revised scale of pay introduced with effect from 01.01.1996. When it came to the notice that the PCDA, Allahabad was not extending

the said benefit, the Central Government clarified as under:

It is clarified that pension of all pre-96 retiree Armed Forces personnel will be revised on the basis of the rank/group last held by the

individual and the revised pay scale connected thereto, even if the rank/group was held for less than 10 months before retirement. Such

pension will be reduced proportionately if the qualifying service is less than 33 years. Other conditions to earn pension will continue to

apply.

We do not find any justification on the part of the respondents in not fixing the pension of the applicant in the rank of CHELP in accordance with the

relevant Government orders, as he had already been promoted to that rank before the date of his discharge.

Since the case of the applicant is squarely covered by the decisions of the Tribunal in >WO P. Gopalakrishnan v, Union of India and others (0.A

No. 62 of 2014 dated 13.02.2015 (Chennai Bench)) and Ex Sub Mohar Singh v. Union of India and others (0.A No. 444 of 2015 dated 27.09.2017

(Principal Bench)), we allow the 0.A, subject to confirmation of details, directing the respondents as under:

(i) Calculate the pension of the applicant based on the rank of CHELP, the last rank held by him before retirement, and in consonance with the

principles of calculation that have been upheld in the case JWO Gopalakrishnan (supra) in this regard;

(ii) Issue a fresh PPO for the restructured and revised pension of the applicant in the rank of CHELP with effect from the date of his discharge and

pay the arrears of pension within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order.

(iii) In case this order is not implemented within the stipulated time, the respondents shall pay interest @ 8% on the arrears till fully paid.

No order as to costs.