AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
23 paragraphs · 480 words1) The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.555 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Medak, filed this Criminal
Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in the above C.C. A charge sheet came to be filed against the petitioners for the offences
punishable under Section 498-A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2) During pendency of the Criminal Petition, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2021 came to be filed by the second respondent to record the compromise. Along
with the petitions, a joint memo which is signed by the parties and their counsel, photographs of the parties and Photostat copies of their Aadhar Cards
came to be filed. It is stated in the affidavit that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have settled their disputes in terms of the
Memorandum of Understanding, dated 03.08.2021. As per the Memorandum of Understanding, the petitioners have agreed to pay Rs.22,00,000/- to
the 2nd respondent and her daughter Rapolu Harini, towards full and final settlement and the 2nd respondent agreed to receive the same and both the
parties agreed that they shall not initiate any civil or criminal proceedings against each and they shall not interfere in each other’s personal life in
future. Both the parties are agreed that after receipt of the said amount the wife and husband shall file mutual divorce petition before the Court
concerned and they also agreed to withdraw the legal proceedings initiated against each other.
3) Today, both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This Court, when examined, both the
parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding and
the second respondent has stated that she has already received total amount of Rs.22,00,000/- and she has no objection for quashing the proceedings
against the petitioners. The 2nd respondent also stated that the petitioners have transferred the house property bearing House No.14-81/154, Plot
No.154, Ragavendra Colony, Beeramguda, Ameenapur Mandal, Sangareddy in her name by way of executing registered deed.
4) In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.Nos.1 and 2 are
ordered.
5) Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in C.C.No.555 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial First
Class Magistrate, Medak against the petitioners are hereby quashed. However, the petitioners are directed to deposit an amount of Rs.10,000/- before
the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad within seven days from today. The Memorandum of Understanding shall do form part
of the decree and shall binding on both the parties.
6) Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
