High CourtsSingle Bench

Rashmi Ranjan Nayak Vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 8 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 OHC CK 0038

HON’BLE JUDGES
G. Satapathy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 323, 341, 342, 376, 506
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 8642 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 516 words

G. Satapathy, J

1.

This is a bail application U/S.439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with G.R. Case No.266 of 2023 arising out of Puri Sadar P.S. Case No.116 of 2023 pending in the file of learned Nyayadhikari Gramanyayalaya, Puri, for commission of offences punishable under Sections 376/ 341/ 506/ 323/342/34, on the main allegation of committing rape upon the victim and threatening her.

2.

Heard, Mr. B.P. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.R. Acharya, learned counsel for the informant and Mrs. S.R. Sahoo, learned ASC in the matter and perused the record.

3.

After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of accusations raised against the petitioner and regard being had to the statement of the victim and taking into account the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 04.07.2023 with submission of charge sheet in the meanwhile and taking into account the other circumstance on record in entirety, this Court admits the petitioner to bail.

4.

Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following conditions:-

(i) the petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail,

(ii) the petitioner shall attend the trial Court on each date of posting without fail unless his attendance is dispensed with. In case the Petitioner fails without sufficient cause to appear in the Court in accordance with the terms of the bail, the learned trial Court may proceed against the Petitioner for offence U/S.229-A of IPC in accordance with law.

(iii) the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial Court without prior permission till disposal of the case and

(iv) the Petitioner shall report attendance before the jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on Sunday in between 10A.M. to 12 Noon for six(06) months from the actual date of his release from the custody.

(v) the petitioner shall not enter into the village of Ambapada, Dist-Puri and also shall not make any attempt to establish any contact with the victim till recording of evidence of the victim.

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out. In the wake of aforesaid, the subsequent involvement of the petitioner for similar offence in future on prima facie accusations may be treated as a ground for cancellation of bail.

5.

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

6.

Urgent certified copy of the order be granted on proper application.

…………………………….