High CourtsSingle Bench

Rashpal Singh vs State of Punjab and Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 August 2012 · Citation: (2012) 08 P&H CK 0200

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 15919 of 2012 (O and M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 221 words

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J.—The petitioner, who is working on the post of Multipurpose Health Supervisor in the Department of Health & Family Welfare, State of Punjab has impugned in terms of filing the present writ petition the order dated 9.8.2012 (Annexure P-3), whereby he has been transferred from C.H.C, Kahnuwan, Gurdaspur To P.H.C. Mandot, Ferozepur. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would place reliance upon the transfer policy (Annexure P-4) to contend that since the wife of the petitioner is also a Govt. employee as such the normal tenure of posting should be 5 years, whereas the petitioner has served at Kahnuwan only for a period of 3 years.

2.

It is by now well settled that deviation from any transfer policy/guidelines would not vest in an employee an enforceable right. Be that as it may, the Hon''ble Apex Court in case of Union of India & others Vs. S.L. Abbas reported as 1995(4) S.C.T 455 has categorically observed that the competent/appropriate authority while issuing orders of transfer shall keep in mind the transfer guidelines/policy framed by the State itself. I find no merit in the present writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, open for the petitioner to pursue his representation dated 11.8.2012 (Annexure P-5), which is stated to have already been submitted before the respondent-authorities