High CourtsSingle Bench

Rasulan Bibi vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 10 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 CHH CK 0148

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 — Section 44
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 2134 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 135 words

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

1.

Heard.

2.

The order under challenge is an interim order passed by respondent No.2-Collector, Balrampur, in an appeal preferred by respondent No.6 Smt.

Manhgi Devi.

3.

The petitioner has an option of moving an application for vacating stay before the Collector or to prefer an appeal/revision before the Commissioner

under Section 44 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code, 1959. The petitioner instead of availing any of the option has straightway rushed to this Court.

4.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already appeared before the Collector.

5.

If that be so, the petitioner may move fresh application for vacating stay, which shall be considered by the Collector in accordance with law at the

earliest.

6.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.