AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
50 paragraphs · 889 wordsThe present petition has been filed by petitioners Ratan Singh and Smt. Rajjo Bai parents of Mangal Singh petitioner to SBCRLMP No. 4505/2018.
This Court on 30.8.2018 had passed the following order:-
“Mr. S.S. Sunda, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the son of the petitioner performed marriage with Deepika Kumari to the
annoyance of relations of Deepika Kumari. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that one of the relations of Deepika Kumari is posted in
office of Superintendent of Police, Alwar. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the petition seeking quashing of FIR filed by son of
the petitioners is coming up for hearing on
10.9.2018.
Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to call the investigating officer alongwith the records of the case in this Court on the next date of hearing.
List this case alongwith SBCRLMP No.4505/2018 on 10.9.2018. Meanwhile, further proceedings arising out of impugned FIR shall remain stayed.
A copy of this order under the seal and signature of the Court Master be handed over to the learned Public Prosecutor for onward transmission and
necessary compliance.â€
Today vide a separate order, this Court in SBCRLMP No. 4505/2018 has quashed FIR No.08/2016 registered at Police Station Tijara, Alwar for
the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366 IPC.
The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the FIR No. 527/2018 dated 11.8.2018 registered at same police station i.e. Tijara, Alwar
is off shoot of FIR No.08/2016, which has been quashed today vide a separate order.
The order of even date passed in SBCRLMP No.4505/2018 wherein FIR has been quashed, reads as under:-
“The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.08/2016 registered at Police Station Tijara, Alwar for
the offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC.
This Court on 9.8.2018 directed the Dy. Registrar (Judicial) to record the statement of Deepika Kumari petitioner no.2, after she is identified by her
counsel. The statement of Deepika Kumari recorded by the Dy. Registrar (Judicial) is taken on record and for ready reference, the same is
reproduced below:-
“jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ihB]t;iqj
,l0ch0 fØfeuy fel0 ihfV’ku uEcj 4505@2018 eaxy flag o vU; cuke ljdkj o vU; fnukad 03-08-2018
eSa nhfidk dqekjh iq=h Jh d`"".k dqekj] vk;q yxHkx 20 o""kZ]tkfr&tksxh] fuoklh&xkao jkb[ksM+k] ih,l frtkjk] ftyk&vyoj gky fuoklh xkao fHkanwlh] ih,l
frtkjk] ftyk&vyojA
'kiFk iwoZd c;ku djrh gwW d eSa eaxy flag dks fiNys yxHkx 3 lky ls tkurh gwWA eaxy flag esjs xkao ls yxHkx 3 fdyksehVj fHkanwlh xkao dk jgus
okyk gSaA eSa eaxy flag ds xkao fHkanwlh esa i20 lky vkSj eaxy flag dh mez 22 lky gSA ?kjokys gekjh 'kknh ds fy, jkth ugha FksA esjs ?kjokysa esjh 'kknh esjh ethZ ds f[kykQ dgha vkSj djuk
pkgrs FksAÂ vkSj eq>s esjh ethZ ds f[kykQ 'kknh djus ds fy, VkpZj djrs Fks blfy, esa ?kj ij fcuk crk;s eaxyflag ds lkFk viuh ethZ ls ,oa fcuk fdlh
ncko ds pyh x;h vkSj fnukad 02-01-2015 dks xq:}kjk esa tkdj 'kknh dj yhA esjs ?kjokyksa us eaxyflag ,oa mlds ifjokjokyksa ds f[kykQ esjs vigj.k dh tks
fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h gS og xyr ,oa >wBh gSA eaxyflag ,oa mlds ifjokjokyks ds mij ls esjs vigj.k dk bZYtke gVk fn;k tk;sA eSa Lo;a viuh ethZ ls eaxyflag
ds lkFk x;h FkhA orZeku esa eSa vius ifr ds lkFk gh jg jgha gWw vkSj Hkfo""; esa Hkh vius ifr ds lkFk gh jguk pkgrh gWwA ge nksuks dk bl 'kknh ls
,d 7 ekg dk cPPkk Hkh gSA esjs /kjokysa gekjh 'kknh ls [kq’k ugha gS vkSj oks gesa ijs’kku djrs gSA gesa iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tk;sA eq>s
vkSj dqN ughs dguk gSA
uksV%& xokg dk c;ku esjs funsZâ€ku esa mlds dgs vuqlkj Vad.kdrkZ } kjk dEI;qVj ij Vafdr fd;k x;k] ftls xokg dks ik;k x;k rks mlus
mDr dFkuksa dsk lqu o le> dj lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;k
vkj0vks0,.M+ ,0lh0
fMIVh jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½â€
Mr. Prakash Thakuriya, learned Public Prosecutor on instructions from ASI Net Ram, Police Station Tijara, Alwar investigating officer has very
fairly submitted that petitioner no.2 Deepika Kumari is more than 18 years of age and she has given birth to a child and she is living happily with her
husband Mangal Singh.
Considering the statement made by petitioner no.2 Deepika Kumari before Dy. Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, which has been reproduced above,
and the statement made by learned Public Prosecutor on instructions from Net Ram, ASI, Police Station Tijara, Alwar, the present petition is accepted
and the impugned FIR No.08/2016 registered at Police Station Tijara, Alwar for the offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC is quashed alongwith all
subsequent proceedings. â€
Deepika Kumari petitioner no.2 to SBCRLMP No.4505/2018 who is present in the court has stated that her husband Mangal Singh has been
arrested by police as her relation is posted in office of Superintendent of Police, Alwar and police is not accepting her marriage with Mangal Singh.
Let a detail reply be filed by Superintendent of Police.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the bail application of Mangal Singh son of petitioners is coming up for hearing before the
coordinate Bench.
List for arguments on 1.12.2018. Till next date, the interim order already in favour of the petitioners shall continue.
