High CourtsSingle Bench

Ratheesh vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 24 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 KL CK 0176

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gopinath P, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code,1860 — Section 307, 324
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.10082 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 462 words

Gopinath P., J

1.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.922/2021 of Chalakudy Police Station, Thrissur District alleging commission of offences under Sections

324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner with an intention to kill his own mother, he attacked and injured her and inflicted cut injury

on the back side of her neck and on her face and thereby he committed the offences alleged against him.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had not attacked his mother in the manner suggested by the prosecution. It is

submitted that owing to some disputes there was some argument between him and his mother but he had no occasion to attack his mother in the

manner suggested. It is submitted that his mother has filed an affidavit before this court stating that she has no objection in bail being granted to the

petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody from 01-12-2021 and his continued detention is not necessary for the purposes of any

investigation.

4.

The learned Public Prosecutor vehementally opposes the grant of bail. It is submitted that if the petitioner is granted bail he will return back to the

house where his mother is also residing and there is every chance of the offence being repeated. It is also submitted that a successful prosecution of

the petitioner may not be possible if he is released on bail as there is every chance that even the injured may turn hostile to the prosecution case.

5.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for 55 days and his

continued detention may not be necessary for the purpose of investigation in the matter, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted bail subject

to strict conditions.

In the result this bail application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the

jurisdictional Court;

(ii) The Petitioner shall report before the Investigating officer in Crime No.922/2021 of Chalakudy Police Station on every Saturday at 11 a.m until further orders;

(iii) The petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation, influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.922/2021 of Chalakudy Police Station;

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If the petitioner violates any condition the Station House Officer, Chalakudy Police Station shall file an application before this court for cancellation of

bail.