High CourtsSingle Bench

Rathnamma vs Thippeswamy & Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 26 June 2024 · Citation: (2024) 06 KAR CK 0039

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.P. Sandesh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Regular Second Appeal No. 28 Of 2018 (PAR)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 110 words

H.P. Sandesh, J

1.

This matter is called twice today in the morning as well as in the afternoon. But, no representation by the respective parties. The learned counsel for the respondent was present in the earlier occasion. This Court made it clear that if the counsel for appellant does not appear in the next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed for non-prosecution. Inspite of the said order, both the counsel for respective parties are absent before the Court. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

2.

In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.As., if any do not survive for consideration, the same stands disposed of.