High CourtsDivision Bench

Ratnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 22 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 PAT CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J · Dr. Anshuman, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226, 243O, 243O(b) · Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 — Section 137
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 39 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 257 words
1.

In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the election of Kudhani Gram Panchayat in which respondent no.7, Arun Singh @ Arun Kumar Singh has been elected as Mukhiya.

2.

It is to be noted that sub-clause (b) of Article 243-O of the Constitution of India provides that notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, no election to any Panchayat shall be called in question except by an election petition presented to such authority and in such manner as is provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.

3.

The Legislature of the State of Bihar has enacted Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 wherein Section 137 provides that the election to any office of a Panchayat or a Gram Katchahry shall not be called in question except by an election petition as prescribed.

4.

We may also note at this stage that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Laxmibai vs the Collector Nanded & Ors. since reported in (2020) 12 SCC 186 categorically held that extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being discretionary in nature, may not be exercised when an efficacious alternative remedy is available and moreso restrain must be exercised in terms of mandate of Article 243-O of the Constitution of India.

5.

In above view of the matter since an equally efficacious statutory remedy is available to the petitioner for redressal of his grievance, we are not inclined to entertain the present application under extraordinary writ jurisdiction. It is dismissed, accordingly.