AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 404 wordsHeard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner prays for provisional release of the Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR50H3208, Chassis No. MBLJARQ23HGDQ3321, Engine No.JA06ERHGD05176 which has been seized in connection with Excise Case No. 778 of 2018 in connection with Sinheswar P.S. Case No. 87 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is pending and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list supports the seizure of the motorcycle and 375 ml. of IMFL.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is pending, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the District Magistrate, Supaul with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:
(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.
(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.
(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared by the District Magistrate, Supaul wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.
The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above. This release would however, be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding if any.
With the observations, this writ petition is allowed.
