AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 494 wordsSubodh Abhyankar, J
This is the second application filed by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail during the trial.
The applicant is facing trial for offence punishable under Sections 306/34 of the IPC, registered at Police Station- Hatod, Distrcit-Indore in Crime
No.186/2020. The applicant is in jail since 21.7.2020.
Applicant's earlier bail application M.Cr.C.No.48337/2020 has been dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 5.2.2021.
Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is in jail since 21.7.202 and the final conclusion of trial is likely to take sufficiently long time
on account of Covid-19 pandemic. Counsel has further submitted that under identical circumstances, co-accused persons Ramchandra and Sharda Bai
have been granted bail by this Court in M.Cr.C.Nos. 31003/2020 and 38121/2020 vide order dated 15.9.2020 and 10.11.2020 respectively and also
taking note of the fact that the statement of Sonakshi, daughter of the deceased, recorded under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. has not been made a part
and parcel of the challan. Counsel has drawn attention of this Court towards the last order sheet dated 6.5.2021 of the present case wherein this Court
has also directed to the learned counsel for the respondent/State to produce the statement of Sonakshi and on which the learned Judge of the trial
Court has also relied upon while rejecting the applicant's bail application. Counsel has submitted that since the statements of the witness Sonakshi are
not part and parcel of the challan the same can not been taken into consideration. Hence, it is submitted that looking to the omnibus allegations the
applicant deserves to be released on bail.
Learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer. However, it is submitted that having could not lay his
hands on the statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. at the instance of Sonakshi, the daughter of the deceased. However, looking to the
allegations levelled against the applicant, no case for grant of bail is made out.
Having considered the rival submissions, on perusal of the case diary, taking note of the fact that co-accused persons have already been granted bail
by this Court in M.Cr.C.Nos. 31003/2020 and 38121/2020 vide order dated 15.9.2020 and 10.11.2020 and final and the final conclusion of the trial is
likely to take sufficiently long time, this Court finds it expedient to allow the bail application. Accordingly, the present application for grant of bail is
hereby allowed.
The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed. The applicant shall be abide by the conditions
as enumerated under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.
This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
Certified copy, as per rules.
