High CourtsSingle Bench

Ravi Dhanuhaar vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 10 May 2022 · Citation: (2022) 05 CHH CK 0056

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 34(2), 59A(ii)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Misc. Criminal Case No. 3904 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 483 words
1.

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 03/2022, registered at Police Station­Excise Circle Kota, District Bilaspur (CG), for the offences punishable under Sections 34(1)(क) (ख) 34(2) & 59(क) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, 21.000 bulk liters of country made liquor was seized by the police from the present applicant.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in crime in question. He is in custody since 16/04/2022.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

6.

Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59­A(ii) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915, and bearing in mind the principles of law laid down in Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh 2015(2) C.G.L.J. 341, if the facts of present case are examined, it is apparent that there is no criminal antecedent of the present applicant and only 21.000 bulk liters of country made liquor has been seized from him which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that it is the first offence of the applicant and he is in custody since 16/04/2022 and case is triable by the concerned Court and trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion that present is the fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/­ with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions:

(i) That, the applicant shall furnish a specific undertaking that while on bail, he will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled and shall co­operate the prosecution during trial.

(ii) That, the accused/applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

(iii) That, the accused/applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial.

8.

Certified copy as per rules.