High CourtsSingle Bench

Ravi Kant vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 7 November 2023 · Citation: (2023) 11 SHI CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sushil Kukreja, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 2840 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 201 words

Sushil Kukreja, J

1.

Notice. Mr. Jitender Kumar Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.

2.

Learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent-State stated at bar that since the investigation is still in progress, as such, the status report is not being filed as it may prejudice the investigation. He further stated that, at this stage, the investigating agency is not going to arrest the petitioner and in the event of his arrest, the investigating agency will give seven days notice in advance to the petitioner, so that he can avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

3.

In view of the statement of the learned Additional Advocate General, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file the fresh bail application at the appropriate stage.

4.

Therefore, in view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as aforesaid. However, in the meantime, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when called by the Investigating Officer.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.